ponderous potter review

The Chamber of Secrets must be where they locked up the editor. You could have left half the movie on the cutting room floor, and this would have been great. Cut every single lingering close up on one of the kids’ faces, and all of the ponderious overexplanations and you’ll have shaved a good hour off the movie. When you go out of your way to setup a major plot device early in the film - in a fairly clunky way, I might add, so even the 8 year old next to you is saying “hmm… wonder why they told us that?”, then you bring that plot device in near the end of the movie, do we really need a 5 minute scene re-explaining the plot device? Perhaps so since 4 hours and 50 minutes have passed since the first introduction :)

I’m being pretty harsh. It wasn’t that bad. The first one was considerably better, but the first hour and change was actually pretty good. And I could have watched Branaugh all night. He made this one..

4 Responses to “ponderous potter review”

  1. Jason D- Says:

    Crap, of course the first hour and change is all I got thru so far. Oh well.

  2. Will Says:

    I dunno, I look at this Harry Potter much in the same way I looked at the last one: its just a warm up for Lord of the Rings :-) Hey Brian, how bout those trailers? Could they have been any worse? lol

  3. Jason D- Says:

    I thought Jason Isaacs was better. He is makig a great name for himself as a damn fine villian. He was excellent in the Patriot. Aka, Braveheart 2.

  4. Jason D- Says:

    My damn link didn’t come thru…
    http://us.imdb.com/Name?Isaacs,%20Jason

    And they never explained the boomerang car did they? And fuckin a. Did I mention I fucking HATE spiders?

Leave a Reply